Post by account_disabled on Feb 20, 2024 5:22:17 GMT -4
Newspapers opted fovertising and forgot to produce relevant content. Much of the content was published for free to achieve maximum exposure, at the end of the day what mattered was advertising revenue. Thenewspapers passed years of teaching people that money was nothing to worry about, that scale was everything, that advertising was plentiful, and that people should get whatever they wanted for free (even if it was low quality). Then came the big technology companies, focused on reaching as many people as possible using the money injected by their investors and, of course, giving it “everything” for free. Then it was the turn of streaming services, which also reduced television income.
Guess where the advertising money migrated to? Read also: Why newspapers should not give free news during crises? Privacy: a new currency I have already talked enough about responsibility and I think you understand me. Now Rich People Phone Number List we will see how the press (not) prepares for the future. If in the past the press "shrugged its shoulders" and said that it could not do anything, that it was not its responsibility, today it must put itself in a position to assume that responsibility. Data protection laws in Europe (GDPR), the United States (CCPA – California) and, more recently, Brazil (LGPD) are holding vehicles to greater responsibility, particularly with respect to data and vehicle privacy. the users. A recent
survey of 1,000 US citizens revealed (PDF of survey in full): 91% of respondents believe companies should be responsible for the data they collect. Said in media terms, it means that people believe that you, as a newspaper, are responsible for what third parties do with the data collected through your website; 84% said they wanted state legislation that gave consumers control over their data; 91% wanted the right to delete their data and know where and how it was used (as is the case with GDPR in Europe); 56% say companies should prioritize consumer privacy. This means that newspapers must act on privacy instead of asking people to give it up, as is done in most cases; 87% affirm that data privacy is a
Guess where the advertising money migrated to? Read also: Why newspapers should not give free news during crises? Privacy: a new currency I have already talked enough about responsibility and I think you understand me. Now Rich People Phone Number List we will see how the press (not) prepares for the future. If in the past the press "shrugged its shoulders" and said that it could not do anything, that it was not its responsibility, today it must put itself in a position to assume that responsibility. Data protection laws in Europe (GDPR), the United States (CCPA – California) and, more recently, Brazil (LGPD) are holding vehicles to greater responsibility, particularly with respect to data and vehicle privacy. the users. A recent
survey of 1,000 US citizens revealed (PDF of survey in full): 91% of respondents believe companies should be responsible for the data they collect. Said in media terms, it means that people believe that you, as a newspaper, are responsible for what third parties do with the data collected through your website; 84% said they wanted state legislation that gave consumers control over their data; 91% wanted the right to delete their data and know where and how it was used (as is the case with GDPR in Europe); 56% say companies should prioritize consumer privacy. This means that newspapers must act on privacy instead of asking people to give it up, as is done in most cases; 87% affirm that data privacy is a